March, 2025 Drink & a Movie: All In + Bob le Flambeur

From where I’m standing the net impact of expanded legalized sports betting has clearly been negative. Research shows that it results in increased levels of debt for individual consumers, athletes are subject to unconscionable levels of abuse because of it, and the constant barrage of ads and ridiculous celebrity parlays makes the experience of watching sports on TV less fun. For all of these reasons I’d probably support more regulation at this point despite my libertarian inclinations, but as long as it remains so easy to place a bet, I will selfishly continue to enjoy doing so during certain times of year. March is one of them because of the NCAA Tournament, so lately I’ve been thinking about my favorite titular (which disqualifies Howard Ratner) movie gambler, Bob Montagné (Roger Duchesne). Here’s a picture of my Kino Lorber DVD copy of the film he lent his name to, Bob le Flambeur:

Bob le Flambeur DVD case

It is also available for rental from a variety of other platforms, and some people (including current Cornell University faculty, staff, and students) may have access to it through Kanopy via a license paid for by their local academic or public library as well.

The drink I’m pairing it with was created by Natasha David as boozy version of her favorite thing to eat, “dark, bitter chocolate.” Here, per Imbibe, is how you make her All In (which for the uninitiated is a poker term which refers to the act of pushing all of one’s chips into the middle of the table) cocktail:

1 1/2 ozs. Rye (Pikesville)
3/4 oz. Campari
3/4 oz. Dry vermouth (Dolin)
1/4 oz. Crème de cacao (Tempus Fugit)

Stir all ingredients with ice and strain into a chilled cocktail glass. Express a lemon twist over the top and discard.

All In in a cocktail glass

This concoction’s nose is dominated by lemon from the twist, and my brain therefore immediately latched on to the citrus notes in the Campari and Dolin on the sip. There’s also a lot of burn from the rye, though, which combines to create an initial impression not unlike drinking grappa. The swallow and finish are all very dark (think 85+% cacao) chocolate. David specifies rye that is 100-proof or higher, making this a perfect place to showcase Pikesville, which clocks in at 110 and is totally my jam these days. She also described her goal being “to create a dry chocolate cocktail that wasn’t limited to a dessert drink—a cocktail that could be enjoyed any time of the day,” and in that regard the All In is a resounding success.

Bob would appreciate this beverage, as he is no stranger to imbibing during the daylight hours. Here, for instance, we see his best laid plans for breakfast being waylaid by a tempting bottle of wine:

Overhead shot of Bob reading the label on a bottle of wine
Bob pauses while lighting the stove on the other side of the room to look back at the bottle
Overhead of shot of Bob pouring himself a glass of wine

His luxurious apartment, which has one of the best views in the history of cinema and a slot machine in the closet:

Bob standing in front of a giant window with a great view of Paris
Bob pulling the lever on the slot machine he keeps in a closet

“Absolutely massive American car,” as Nick Pinkerton says in his DVD commentary track (where he also identifies it as a 1955 Plymouth Belvedere):

Medium shot of Bob's car

And the fact that he appears to have a standing invitation to join any high-stakes game in Paris all suggest that he must have been more disciplined in his youth, but he is become, in the words of his best friend Roger (André Garet), a “pitiful” compulsive gambler who squanders every big win by taking his profits elsewhere and promptly losing them.

Roger gives Bob some tough love after a bad night at the casino

Because he does so in style, though, and according to a moral code that includes generosity to those even less fortunate as one of its primary tenets, he nonetheless remains an idol to the young men in his circle like Paolo (Daniel Cauchy), whose late father knew Bob back in his gangster days:

Medium shot of Bob regaling Paolo, who is dressed similarly, about a bad bead

A hero to young women like Isabelle Corey’s Anne, to whom he provides pocket money and a place to sleep with no expectation of repayment in any form:

Medium shot of Anne dancing with Bob

And the object of fraternal or maternal affection from compatriots like Roger and Simone Paris’s Yvonne, who purchased her café with a loan from him:

Medium shot of Yvonne talking to Bob over a glass of pastis

As well as the recipient of professional courtesy from René Havard’s Inspector Morin of the police, whose life he once saved:

Inspector Morin and Bob talk in the back seat of a police car while smoking cigarettes

If you didn’t know this was a caper movie, you’d never guess it from the first 37 minutes, which function more as a sort of nature documentary showing Bob in his natural environment. As Glenn Erickson observes in his review of Kino Lorber’s 4K Ultra HD + Blu-ray copy of the film which came out last year, the location shooting makes it “a literal time capsule of a long-gone Montmartre, a collection of nightclubs and bars where colorful, unsavory night crawlers plot their next moves.” It begins with a monologue that characterizes the Parisian neighborhood as “both heaven and . . . hell” with the image of a descending funicular and accompanying musical cue during the ellipse.

Establishing shot of the Basilique du Sacré-Cœur de Montmartre
Long shot of the Montmartre funicular
Long shot of neon signs at dawn

Anne is introduced as an illustration of how “people of different destinies” cross paths in the pre-dawn hours not by name, but as a girl “with nothing to do” who is “up very early . . . and far too young” who passes a cleaning lady hurrying to work on the street:

Long shot of Anne passing a cleaning lady on the street

Finally, we meet Bob playing craps in an establishment featuring the first example of what J. Hoberman calls “the insistent checkerboard patterns that make the movie so emphatically black-and-white”:

Bob playing craps in a room with checkerboard-patterned walls

They appear again on the walls of Roger’s office, where author of A History of the French New Wave Cinema Richard Neupert argues they function “to remind the viewer that Bob, with his flowing white hair, sees the world as one big board game”:

Long shot of Bob and Roger talking in the latter's office, which is decorated in a checkerboard pattern reminiscent of the one in the previous image

Per Neupert, Bob le Flambeur inspired the French New Wave with its “raw, low-budget style that mixes documentary style with almost parodic artifice.” My favorite examples of both tendencies can be found in the rehearsals which lead up to the attempted robbery that Bob begins to plan after he learns that the safe in the Deauville casino will have 800 million francs (which as near as I can work out is about $20 million USD today) at 5am the morning of the upcoming Grand Prix race. After he and Roger find someone (Howard Vernon as McKimmie, who insists on a 50% cut of the take) to finance their operation in the first of many scenes that the 2001 remake of Ocean’s Eleven directed by Steven Soderbergh pays homage to, the “recruitment waltz” begins:

Medium shot of Bob recruiting someone to help him rob the Deauville casino
Medium shot of Roger signing up another member of their crew

With their team assembled, they set about casing the joint by circling it repeatedly in a car and sketching an outline in a minute-long scene that embodies the “documentary style” Neupert describes:

The Deauville casino through the window of a car
The car's passenger sketches the outline of the building

They also obtain blueprints and specs which they use to obtain a safe so that Roger can practice opening it:

Medium shot of Roger opening a safe as Bob, Paolo, and McKimmie look on

And best of all draw chalk outlines of the casino on a grass field so that they get an accurate sense of the space:

Medium shot of Bob gesturing at a floor plan
Bob directs a member of his crew to the spot on the outline of the casino where he is supposed to stand during the robbery
Bob standing at his spot

We also see Bob’s vision of how the operation is supposed to in a casino of empty of anyone except him and his crew, a technique borrowed by my July, 2023 Drink & a Movie selection Inside Man among scores of other films:

Bob imagines his crew arriving at the casino
The crew at their posts with guns drawn
Bob in a tuxedo at his spot at the top of the stairs

We never see the actual heist, though, because although Bob arrives at the casino to scope things out at 1:30am as planned in a stylish low-light sequence:

Long shot of blurry car headlights next to blurry streetlights that look like flowers

Instead of making contact with Claude Cerval’s Jean, their guy on the inside, like he’s supposed to, he forgets his promise to himself and Roger not to gamble until it is over and places a bet:

Long shot of Bob placing a bet on roulette

He wins, so he places another, this time at odds of 38 to 1:

Close-up of bets being placed on 15 in roulette

That hits, too:

Close-up of a roulette wheel landing on 15

And suddenly Bob is off on the heater of his life. The voiceover informs us although the roulette is over by 2:01, “the chemin de fer continues”:

Long shot of Bob playing chemin de fer

He is successful there, and at 2:45 he enters a the high-rollers room:

Medium shot of Bob entering the "private room"

It’s difficult to say for sure how much he wins there, but by 3:30 he has attracted a crowd of onlookers:

Well-dressed strangers look over Bob's shoulders to see what cards he has

And not long after that, he’s tipping the croupier one million francs at a time:

Bob picks up a 1 million franc chip to tip the croupier

Based on the stacks of chips in shots like this, it appears that Bob’s winnings total nearly as much as the 400 million francs he and his crew are expecting to make from robbing the casino. Suddenly he chances to look at his watch and sees that it’s 5am:

Close-up of Bob's watch showing the time as 5:00

He shouts, “change all this, now!” and sprints to the entrance, but it’s too late: the police, tipped off by Jean and his wife (Colette Fleury) and an informant (Gérard Buhr) armed with details that Paolo carelessly let slip to Anne, are waiting for Bob’s crew when they arrive and Paolo dies in the shootout which ensues:

Overhead shot of Paolo "getting it," as the fella says

Bob arrives just in time to cradle his protege in his arms as his life expires:

Close-up of Bob cradling Paolo in his arms as he dies

As Inspector Morin places Bob and Roger in handcuffs, one of his officers removes a coin from Bob’s pocket that we saw him flipping earlier.

A police officer inspects the coin he just removed from Bob's pocket

“I’ve known it was double-headed for ten years,” Roger tells him. “And I’ve known you knew for ten years,” Bob replies. “Paulo knew too,” he adds. Just then the somber mood is broken by a procession of bellhops bringing out Bob’s winnings:

Medium shot of a bellhop holding a tray of cash
Another bellhop with an arm full of cash
The police help one of the bellhops load the money he is carrying into the trunk of a police car

“And don’t let any of it go missing!” Bob says as he is led into a squad car. “Criminal intent to commit . . . you’ll get five years,” Morin says as he offers Bob and Roger cigarettes.

Medium shot of Inspector Morin offering cigarettes to Bob and Roger, who sit behind him in a car

“But with a good lawyer, you might get away with three years,” he continues. “With a very good lawyer, and no criminal intent, maybe an acquittal!” Roger adds. And finally Bob: “If I play my cards right, I might even be able to claim damages!” The movie ends with a amazing shot of his car sitting in front of the Deauville shore as the sun rises behind it:

Long shot of Bob's car in the bottom 1/3 of the frame and the coast in the top 1/3 of the frame, with empty sand in between

Dave Kehr writes in an essay that appears in his book When Movies Mattered that “[director Jean-Pierre] Melville is often described as an existentialist, but to execute a scene like the finish of Bob le Flambeur, even in jest, you need to have some faith in the basic benevolence of the world–some faith in a higher, protective power, such as the ‘luck’ that Bob turns his back on and that then returns, in the end, to save and reward him after all.” I couldn’t agree more with the first part of this statement, but would quibble just a bit with the latter. Bob never *abandons* Lady Luck; rather, ever the gentleman, he tries to take a hint and move on when it seems like he has lost her favor, but when he realizes his error, he’s more than happy to come home. As the voiceover remarked earlier as the seconds ticked down to 5:00, “that’s Bob the gambler as his mother made him!” I noted last February in a post about The Young Girls of Rochefort that a friend has suggested that the theme of this series is “the human experience of trying to become a better person.” I suppose that must make Bob le Flambeur another exception to this rule.

Cheers!

All original photographs in this post are by Marion Penning, aka My Loving Wife. Links to all of the entries in this series can be found here.

Ithaca Film Journal: 3/13/25

What I’m Seeing This Week: I wasn’t able to make it to Mickey 17 last week after all, so seeing it at Cinemapolis or the Regal Ithaca Mall is my first order of business. My Loving Wife and I are also planning a “date night” (we’re probably actually going to hit a matinee) outing to Black Bag at one of those two theaters as well.

Also in Theaters: The best new film now playing Ithaca that I’ve already seen is Close Your Eyes, which screens at Cornell Cinema on Sunday. No Other Land, which continues its run at Cinemapolis, made my “Top Ten Movies of 2024” list too, and I recommend Best Picture Oscar winner Anora (Cinemapolis and the Regal) as well. I’m also intrigued by Toxic, which is at Cornell Cinema tonight, and am looking forward to selecting Paddington in Peru (Regal) and The Day the Earth Blew Up: A Looney Tunes Movie (Cinemapolis and the Regal) for Family (née Friday) Movie Night later this year. Noteworthy special events include an event called “Nosferatu x Radiohead: A Silents Synced Film” at Cornell Cinema and a free Pi Day screening of the documentary Counted Out at Cinemapolis tomorrow; a free “Family Classics Picture Show” screening of An American Tail at Cinemapolis on Sunday; and a free screening of Alien at Cornell Cinema on Wednesday. Finally, your best bets for repertory fare are Peeping Tom and The Red Shoes, which play Cornell Cinema tonight and Saturday respectively.

Home Video: It recently occurred to me that The Crowd, one of my favorite movies of all time, has now been in the public domain in the United States for more than a year. I was utterly shocked to discover that it nonetheless remains unavailable on a good R1 Blu-ray/DVD release. It can, however, be streamed on Watch TCM until March 21. Here’s what I wrote about it on Letterboxd after revisiting it there last week:

John Sims (James Murray) stars as a man who inherits the vision of exceptionalism his father (Warner Richmond) had for him and learns the hard way each time how to fall in love with first the mother (Eleanor Boardman) of his first child (Freddie Burke Frederick); then Mary, the actual flesh-and-blood woman who occupies that role; and finally the life they’ve been really living all the while he was dreaming, hopefully just in time to finally lay a foundation before the Great Depression that not even the filmmakers know is barreling down upon them hits. Mary’s brothers (Daniel G. Tomlinson and Dell Henderson) are perfectly dour avatars of bourgeoisie judgmentalism, and the depictions of the titular urban masses constitute all-time great cinema images which clearly inspired David Lynch, Jacques Tati, Orson Welles, and any number of other giants who followed.

The Welles film most commonly associated with this one is The Trial, but the Crazy House sequence in The Lady from Shanghai, which I wrote about in January, was clearly inspired by it as well. The works by Lynch and Tati I mainly have in mind are Twin Peaks: The Return and Playtime, which I wrote about in December.

Previous “Ithaca Film Journal” posts can be found here. A running list of all of my “Home Video” recommendations can be found here.

Ithaca Film Journal: 3/6/25

What I’m Seeing This Week: I am excited to finally see Universal Language, which I heard great things about as it worked its way across the film festival circuit last year, at Cinemapolis! I am also going to try to catch Mickey 17 there or at the Regal Ithaca Mall on the only other evening I’m free.

Also in Theaters: Cornell Cinema has an absolutely killer lineup this week that my schedule doesn’t permit me to take advantage of, but you should if you can! If I was free on Saturday, I would definitely be going to the “unique Cornell version of Eno,” and if I was free tomorrow I’d probably prioritize Toxic ahead of Mickey 17 and Universal Language. They’re also screening Close Your Eyes, which landed at fifth place on my Top Ten Movies of 2024 list, tomorrow and my August, 2024 “Drink & a Movie” selection Black Narcissus on Sunday. Otherwise, the best new movie now playing Ithaca that I’ve already seen is newly-minted Best Documentary Feature Oscar winner No Other Land, which continues its run at Cinemapolis, as does this year’s Best International Feature Film I’m Still Here. Best Picture Oscar winner Anora is back in local theaters as well at both Cinemapolis and the Regal. Other noteworthy special events include “An Evening with John Cameron Mitchell” at Cornell’s Schwartz Center for the Performing Arts on Friday; free admission to the Streets Alive! Film Festival at Cinemapolis on Sunday, a free screening of Song Lang at Cornell Cinema on Wednesday, and a preview screening of The Friend at Cinemapolis that same evening. Finally, another repertory highlight is The Adventures of Prince Achmed at Cornell Cinema on Sunday.

Home Video: Speaking of my top ten list for 2024, the film that placed sixth on it, All We Imagine as Light, premieres live on the Criterion Channel at 9pm on Sunday! The first film from India to compete in the main competition at the Cannes Film Festival in 30 years, it won the Grand Prix there and placed fourth in the IndieWire Critics Poll, which is definitely the list of this type that I put the most stock in. Looking back on the only “Ithaca Film Journal” post where I actually had occasion to recommend this movie, I realize I didn’t say anything about it because I assumed I already had! Anyway, it’s a sumptuously photographed tale of platonic and romantic love with a delightfully poetic “plot twist” and an outstanding final shot that features a kid absolutely rocking out to headphone music.

Previous “Ithaca Film Journal” posts can be found here. A running list of all of my “Home Video” recommendations can be found here.

Top Ten Movies of 2024 + Oscar Picks

Last March I celebrated being fully back to “using cinema as a window on the world and a lens through which I can interrogate my thoughts and feelings and refine them into a more consistent and generous philosophy” with my first proper top ten list in many years. In the same post I mentioned the “mixtapes” I’ve been compiling bi-annually for the past decade and started sharing on this blog in 2022, but I didn’t quite make the connection that these are essentially the same activity.

Although I’ve historically been adamant that, as I said in 2021, the songs I include on my mixes “are not necessarily the best songs of the previous six months in my opinion, but rather the ones that gave me the most pleasure and/or affected me the most,” it recently struck me that after more than a decade of listening to hundreds of new albums each year, I likely know more about music than I give myself credit for, at least on an intuitive level; conversely, although I watch hundreds of new movies each year and also spend quite a bit of time immersed in older ones, my knowledge of cinema relative to people who write about it professionally isn’t nearly what it used to be in my 20s when I was fresh out of a film studies program and could afford to live as though I did as well. Even back then I tried to embrace my amateur status: that’s when I came up with the idea of a “movie year” that starts and ends in March instead of January, for instance. Just paying attention isn’t a surefire way to avoid falling into imitative patterns, though, and I recently found myself pondering whether or not this annual list-making exercise serves any purpose for me at all. Delaying its creation makes it a truer representation of my favorites from 2024 by allowing two extra months for many of the most important titles that posterity will label with that year to reach Ithaca and the streaming video services I subscribe to, sure, but is it really worth the time and effort?

To my very great surprise, the answer to this question came from my younger self. Nearly twenty years ago I wrote the following:

I suppose that it’s possible to construct a Top Ten that would satisfy me structured around a list of films numbered from 1-10 that devotes one or two sentences to each movie, with a paragraph-long introduction and conclusion. Possible, but certainly not likely–at any rate, there are better ways. A good list might include scenes from films or lines of dialogue. It can include upcoming films, old films, ideas for films. Buildings. Political scandals. People. Why not? If you’ve explained your goals adequately it can include anything.

At the very least it can include nine films, or eleven. It can include re-releases, short films, and television episodes/seasons/series.

Or. Or the critic can accept all of the limitations of the Top Ten list and simply scribble down ten films and be done with it. Let the readers do the leg work, right? My editor wants a list? Here you go: a list. Because any list of films is interesting, just not necessarily fraught with any particular meaning.

In the 2004 Village Voice year-end poll Lars von Trier’s Dogville (2003) placed third. This did not mean that Dogville was the year’s third best film. It did not mean that it was the year’s third most important, talked about, or divisive film. All that it meant was that Dogville finished third in the Village Voice‘s year-end poll. But by finishing third in this poll Dogville set off a round of discussion about itself, Lars von Trier, the Voice poll, year-end polls in general, and the movies that was important, talked about, and divisive.

What am I saying? I’m suggesting that we don’t need to do away with year-end polls entirely, but that we need to either think more about them or give them less space. That we need to strive to make them relevant and to articulate why we think we’ve succeeded, or that we need to treat them like coffee table books: as conversation starters, and nothing more.

It pains me to see so. many. italics, but I have to admit that the kid has a point. More than one, even! Top ten lists are inherently the kind of endeavor that most people are going to spend either too much time on or too little. Like movie reviews they have value in the aggregate, too, but each individual one of them says more about the person who compiled it than the films they selected, and the list maker can’t just assume that readers already have the necessary context to make sense of their choices–they have to provide it. Professional film critics probably don’t have much say in the matter: they have to deliver whatever the publication they write for wants on deadline with a word count. There’s nothing stopping me, though, from using as much space I need in order to not just explain my picks, but also canvass the entire pool of works I was choosing from and explore how it came to be. What made it to Ithaca . . . and what didn’t? What did I decide not to watch and why? Are there movies that I think the world needs which aren’t even being made?

The problem is that I don’t actually *want* to write this post. I do this for fun, after all, and I’m impatient to move on to Movie Year 2025. And that brings me back to the idea of a playlist. I only recently started providing any commentary at all about the songs on my mixes: initially I just shared the track listing and a Spotify link and called it a day because the idea was for people to actually listen to everything. And that’s true of my favorite films of the year as well! The 13 mentioned below are my answer to the hypothetical question “what should I watch?” They’re the ones I’m most eager to talk about and I can’t resist the urge to add a bit more commentary here, but I’ve already written about everything on Letterboxd and/or this blog at least once, and frankly I’m more interested in having an actual conversation than pontificating further, so please do check them out for yourself and tell me what you think!

Speaking of Letterboxd, one of the main reasons I can barely imagine life without it anymore despite becoming the last cinephile on earth to join little more than 18 months ago is because it makes it super easy to ascertain that I tagged 124 films “Movie Year 2024.” By way of illustrating what does and doesn’t qualify, when I watch Queer after it debuts on Max next month, I won’t tag it “Movie Year 2025” because it played Ithaca in December; however, Universal Language *will* qualify even though it was screened at the 2024 editions of Cannes and TIFF and a bunch of other film festivals because when it opens at Cinemapolis next week, that will be my first opportunity to see it. Anyway, I also saw everything in the Indiewire Critics Poll and CriticsTop10 top 50 lists except Queer and Youth (Hard Times), all of which means that, 1) my local movie theaters are awesome, and 2) this is basically the “top 10% in the class.” Here are the new releases I liked best:

10. Green Border. One of three movies I spent a lot of time thinking about this year as representative of philosophically different takes on the efficacy of depicting horrific acts of injustice. Green Border occupies the optimistic/determined quadrant: director Agnieszka Holland clearly believes that shining a light on the evil deeds desensitized people do in the dark when told enough times that it’s their job and/or their duty will eventually put a stop to them. No Other Land is similarly optimistic, but resigned to the possibility that we the viewers just don’t have the attention span anymore, while Incident is pessimistic but nonetheless keen to continue the fight.

9. Here. Perhaps the most formally audacious and emotionally satisfying film on this list and connected thematically to a number of the rest. Including:

8. La Chimera. Above-ground/beneath-the-surface cantastoria about what it means to live a good life: if your heart’s desire is buried in the dirt under your feet, do you build a shrine on it or dig?

7. About Dry Grasses. When you spend 197 minutes with an unsympathetic character and don’t tire of them, the movie they’re in did something right! Reminded me of college.

6. All We Imagine as Light. Either this film’s adaptation of the Phosphorescent song “Christmas Down Under” or the camera movement at the end of Here was my favorite closing shot of the year.

5. Close Your Eyes. Do you have to know you’re doing it for your life to be your art? Makes an interesting pairing with my first and maybe always favorite cinematic depiction of Ithaca My First Film in the way it depicts a filmmaker engaging with a work made in their youth.

4. Red Rooms. Perhaps the year’s most well-constructed movie. I am planning to write about its poker scenes after my “Drink & a Movie” series wraps in December.

3. Do Not Expect Too Much from the End of the World. History is supposedly written by the victors, but the idea of “winning” is as slippery as quote attribution and the fossil record and racial memory are harder to control than state media and schools, so if you’re thinking in a long enough timeframe, it’s more accurate to say that points will be tallied based on surviving documentation.

2. Evil Does Not Exist. Another film that explores the societal implications of the ideas about personal happiness that appealed to me so much in some of the titles on this list.

1. I Saw the TV Glow. Presumptive shoo-in for any Best of the 2020s list I might someday make along with Crimes of the Future and Petite Maman.

* * *

I also saw a number of terrific older films for the first time last year. Here are the ones that made the biggest impressions:

5. Whiplash. There are still a number of prominent movies released during my period of self-imposed semi-exile from “the lost continent of cinephilia” that I haven’t caught up with yet, but I’ll be surprised if I enjoy any of them half as much as I did Whiplash!

4. Man’s Castle. Instantly my second-favorite movie directed by Frank Borzage after my September “Drink & a Movie” selection History Is Made at Night.

3. House of Usher. I wrote about this film in the next entry in that series.

2. The Act of Killing. This is what the pessimistic/resigned quadrant in the framework I started to sketch out when talking about Green Border looks like.

1. The Long Day Closes. A legit contender for my 2032 Sight & Sound “Greatest Films of All Times” ballot!

* * *

Porcelain War played Cinemapolis for one week in January so I definitely did have an opportunity to see *all* of the films up for Oscars tonight! I guess I’ll have to settle for 48 out of 49. As always, these are the films I’m rooting for, not the ones I expect to win.

Actress in a Supporting Role: Ariana Grande – Wicked

Animated Short: Wander to Wonder

Animated Feature Film: Flow

Original Screenplay: A Real Pain

Adapted Screenplay: A Complete Unknown. I won’t be at all disappointed if Nickel Boys wins, but I loved Pete Seeger’s strategically ill-advised speech about the “teaspoon brigade” and the placement of Joan Baez’s comment “you’re kind of an asshole, Bob.”

Makeup & Hairstyling: The Substance. Demi Moore’s Elisabeth Sparkle’s first prematurely decrepit finger was one of Movie Year 2024’s standout moments for me.

Production Design: The Brutalist

Costume Design: Wicked

International Feature Film: I’m Still Here

Actor in a Supporting Role: Kieran Culkin – A Real Pain

Visual Effects: Dune: Part Two

Film Editing: The Brutalist

Documentary Short: Incident. The only way I won’t throw something at the television if it doesn’t win is if Instruments of a Beating Heart does instead.

Documentary Feature: No Other Land

Cinematography: The Brutalist. I’m incredulous that Nickel Boys wasn’t nominated in this category.

Live-Action Short: A Lien

Sound: Dune: Part Two

Original Score: The Brutalist

Original Song: “Mi Camino”Emilia Pérez. But how did “Claw Machine” from I Saw the TV Glow not even make the shortlist?

Actor in a Leading Role: Ralph Fiennes – Conclave. Give the man an Oscar already!

Directing: Brady Corbet – The Brutalist.

Actress in a Leading Role: Demi Moore – The Substance

Best Picture: The Brutalist.

Ithaca Film Journal: 2/27/25

What I’m Seeing This Week: As longtime readers of this blog know, I consider the “movie year” to begin and end on Oscar night. The Monkey, which I’m planning to catch at either Cinemapolis or the Regal Ithaca Mall, will therefore be my first theatrical screening of 2025. More about this when I publish my top ten list on Sunday!

Also in Theaters: No Other Land, the film I’ll be rooting for to win this year’s Best Documentary Feature Oscar, continues its run at Cinemapolis and remains the best new movie now playing Ithaca that I’ve already seen. I also recommend Best Picture nominees I’m Still Here and The Substance, which are at Cinemapolis all week, and A Complete Unknown, which closes there today. This week’s special events are highlighted by the Ithaca Experimental Film Festival, which is at Cinemapolis on Saturday and Cornell Cinema on Sunday. There is also a free screening of local filmmaker Ira McKinley’s The Throwaways accompanied by excerpts from his new work A Tale of Two Journeys at Cinemapolis tonight and a free screening of the movie Lilting at Cornell Cinema on Wednesday. Finally, doors open for Cinemapolis’s annual Oscar night fundraising gala at 6:30pm on Sunday. On the repertory front, your best best bets are the screenings of Black Narcissus (which I wrote about last August) and The Annihilation of Fish, the rerelease of which Carlos Valladares recently called “the cinematic event of the year,” at Cornell Cinema on Friday and The Red Shoes on Saturday.

Home Video: If you want to see *all* of this year’s Oscar-nominated shorts, you’ll need to head to Cinemapolis or (in the case of the documentaries) Cornell Cinema. The ones I’ll be rooting for are all available online, though! In the Best Animated Short Film category, my favorite is Wander to Wonder, a tale of survival starring characters from a creepy 70s/80s kids television program that uses Shakespearian quotation and engages with the idea of unfathomably (and therefore “indistinguishable from magic) advanced technology (here: VHS!) in a way that reminds me of Arthur C. Clarke’s classic science fiction novel Rendezvous with Rama. It is available for rental via Vimeo. My pick in the Best Live Action Short Film category is streaming on Vimeo for free: A Lien is a tense, effective Paul Greengrass-style shaky cam thriller about the despicable U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (aka ICE) practice of arresting people at their green card interviews. But the cream of the whole crop is Best Documentary Short Film nominee Incident, which uses stunningly complex and effective split-screen editing to recreate the cacophony and chaos of being on the scene of an “incident” (the almost completely unmotivated killing of a black man by a white police officer) that everyone knows never should have happened and fears will blow up into something even more horrible any second and debunks the proceduralist myth of infallible law enforcement professionalism in the process. It is available via The New Yorker. By way of an honorable mention I also recommend Instruments of a Beating Heart, which I described on Letterboxd as “the Muppet Babies version of Whiplash” and which is probably my second-favorite one of these movies overall. It is available via The New York Times.

Previous “Ithaca Film Journal” posts can be found here. A running list of all of my “Home Video” recommendations can be found here.

Ithaca Film Journal: 2/20/25

What I’m Seeing This Week: I decided I didn’t want to risk missing out on No Other Land last week, so I still have one Oscar-nominated shorts program left to go: I’m planning to catch the live action shorts at Cornell Cinema on Saturday, but they’re also playing Cinemapolis all week.

Also in Theaters: No Other Land is a contender for my Movie Year 2024 top ten list (which I’ll publish on Oscar night like usual) and my top new film recommendation. It continues its run at Cinemapolis. Of the two Oscar-nominated shorts programs I’ve already seen, the documentaries are significantly better than the animated shorts. You can see the latter at Cornell Cinema tomorrow, and both are playing Cinemapolis all week. Other first run features I enjoyed include A Complete Unknown and I’m Still Here, both of which are at Cinemapolis. You also have one last chance to see The Brutalist and Nickel Boys, one of which (I still haven’t made up my mind) I’ll be rooting for to win this year’s Best Picture Oscar, there today. On the special events front, the highlights are free screenings of the documentaries The Bomb at Cornell Cinema on Tuesday and of Anonymous Sister and Free For All: The Public Library at Cinemapolis on Saturday and Tuesday respectively. Your best bets for repertory fare are The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp and Fantastic Mr. Fox, which are at Cornell Cinema tonight and Sunday respectively. Finally, I would be remiss if I did not also mention that Twilight, which is beloved of my favorite film scholar who graduated from Cornell Matt Strohl (class of 2003), is screening there on Saturday.

Home Video: Sometimes works of art feel like adaptations even when you know they aren’t. The best example of this for me might be the Beatles song “For No One,” which I always hear as retelling James Joyce’s short story “The Dead.” It is perhaps therefore appropriate that when I finally saw the movie Distant Voices, Still Lives for the first time a couple of weeks ago, the overwhelming impression I got was that it was director Terence Davies’ version of his fellow Liverpudlians’ “In My Life.” I’d have a lot more to say about this movie, which is commonly regarded as both the first and second volumes in a trilogy were it not for the fact that its conclusion, The Long Day Closes, is a straight-up masterpiece. Here’s what I said about it on Letterboxd:

The Christmas dinner interior/exterior mash-up tableau is an all-time great movie image, although the exterior shot of the rowhouse with just the top of a Christmas tree with blinking lights visible through the windows as a drizzly rain falls which follows shortly afterward and the lengthy study of how an old carpet looks at different times of day might resonate with me even more for personal reasons. The opening and closing shots which derive power and meaning from a later string of overhead tracking shots connecting child’s play to cinema to church to school (where the lesson is about the forces of erosion) also rank among the great bookends in cinema history. Finally, if that wasn’t already enough, The Long Day Closes is the best argument I can conceive of for why some (to be clear: not all!) films definitely should have 85-minute runtimes that I can possibly imagine.

The Long Day Closes, which is now streaming on the Criterion Channel, is perfectly intelligible as a standalone work, but it’s totally worth ponying up $2.99 to rent Distant Voices, Still Lives on Prime Video so that you can watch the entire cycle.

Previous “Ithaca Film Journal” posts can be found here. A running list of all of my “Home Video” recommendations can be found here.

February, 2025 Drink & a Movie: Theobroma + Ali: Fear Eats the Soul

Between Valentine’s Day in February and Easter in March/April, I think it’s fair to say we’re in the “chocolate quarter” of the calendar year! In honor of such, this is the first of three Drink & a Movie posts in a row that will feature a drink made with one of my favorite underrated heroes of the back bar: crème de cacao. As Paul Clarke notes in The Cocktail Chronicles, its bad reputation is likely attributable “the substandard quality of many chocolate liqueurs” prevalent on the market until Tempus Fugit Spirits’ version became widely available about ten years ago. It and the Giffard white crème de cacao that I prefer in the 20th Century cocktail I wrote about in 2022 for reasons of color are both excellent, though, and there’s no longer any use to shy away from this ingredient. As described in a post on his blog, Clarke created this month’s drink, the Theobroma, as his version of a chocolate martini. Here’s how to make it:

2 ozs. Reposado tequila (Mi Campo)
1/2 oz. Punt e Mes
1/4 oz. Bigallet China-China
1 tsp. Crème de cacao (Tempus Fugit)
2 dashes Bittermens Xocolatl Mole Bitters

Stir all ingredients with ice and strain into a chilled cocktail glass. Garnish with an orange twist.

Theobroma in a cocktail glass

The Theobroma begins with orange on the nose and an impression of sweet and bitter on the sip which quickly comes into focus as agave and chocolate. “Definitely a tequila drink,” said My Loving Wife, and I wouldn’t want to use something much more assertive than Mi Campos, which in my opinion is currently the best value in the reposado category available here in Ithaca, NY. It is rested in wine barrels, which contributes vanilla flavors also prominent in Tempus Fugit’s crème de cacao that come through on the swallow along with spice and more orange. Clarke’s description of his concoction as “a bold, elbow-throwing mixture that’s unafraid to let its chocolate flag fly” is spot-on, and I’m not going to try to improve on it!

Believe it or not, the chocolate martini was created by actors Rock Hudson and Elizabeth Taylor on the set of the movie Giant. The book Rock Hudson: His Story contains the tale:

Rock and Elizabeth stayed in rented houses across from each other, and it was in one of those houses on a Saturday night in 1955 that they invented the chocolate martini. They both loved chocolate and drank martinis. Why not put chocolate liqueur and chocolate syrup in a vodka martini? They thought it tasted terrific and made a great contribution to society until they began to suffer from indigestion. “We were really just kids, we could eat and drink anything and never needed sleep,” Rock said.

Given these origins, what better film to pair with the Theobroma than a riff on the Rock Hudson vehicle All That Heaven Allows that hails from Germany, “the land of chocolate,” and involves stomach problems as a plot point? I am, of course, referring to Ali: Fear Eats the Soul. Here’s a picture of my Criterion Collection DVD:

Ali: Fear Eats the Soul DVD case

It is also streaming on the Criterion Channel and Max with a subscription, can be rented from a variety of other platforms, and some people (including current Cornell University faculty, staff, and students) may have access to it through Kanopy via a license paid for by their local academic or public library as well.

As Klaus Ulrich Militz writes in his book Personal Experience and the Media, the relationship between Ali: Fear Eats the Soul and All That Heaven Allows “is not as clear as it may seem at first.” For starters, although both films revolve around a May-December romance, director Rainer Werner Fassbinder must have conceived of his movie before he encountered its supposed inspiration for the first time in autumn 1970 because “a rough outline of the film’s story-line is told by the chambermaid in the film The American Soldier,” which he shot two months earlier. The fact that his protagonists Emmi (Brigitte Mira) and Ali (El Hedi ben Salem) enter into a relationship with each other at the beginning of it also represents a major structural break with the earlier movie directed by Douglas Sirk, which “largely follows the emancipatory logic of the melodramatic genre because his heroine only gradually manages to overcome her passivity before she eventually commits herself to her lover.” Nonetheless, per Militz, “the fact remains that when Fassbinder eventually made Ali: Fear Eats the Soul in 1973 this was done under the impression of Sirk’s films.”

One place many people feel the influence of All That Heaven Allows is in Fassbinder’s use of color. For instance, in her chapter for the book Fassbinder Now: Film and Video Art, Brigitte Peucker observes that the “formal, conformist grey clothing” that Emmi and Ali get married in marks them as “constrained by the social order,” but that it’s offset “by the Sirkian red carnations that emblematize emotion”:

Long shot of Ali and Emmi walking hand in hand: he holds an umbrella, and she has a bouquet of carnations in her arms
Medium shot of Ali and Emmi seated at a restaurant with the carnations on the table in front of them

This seems to echo what Brian Price describes in his chapter for the book A Companion to Rainer Werner Fassbinder as the typical reading of the vibrant red dress Jane Wyman’s Cary Scott wears in Heaven to show “what remains inside and–owing to social constraints–invisible.”

Medium shot of Cary Scott sitting on a couch in a red dress drinking martinis with a man in a tuxedo

As he notes, though, Emmi’s flowers are different in that “Fassbinder’s colors, unlike Sirk’s, tend toward disharmony and away from the kind of color coordination that makes analogy possible.” Pointing out that the man Cary is with in the image above, Conrad Nagel’s Harvey, is wearing clothing that matches the furniture they are sitting on, Price argues that this provokes a simile: “Harvey, we might say, is like a couch, something to rest on, something solid but soft, immovable–and worst of all for Harvey, something inanimate, or merely functional.” Contrast this with the dresses Emmi favors elsewhere in Ali, such as the one she has on as she sits “in front of an amateur painting of horses running executed in pale yellow gold tones decidedly less bold than the ones Emmi wears” and curtains “which are no less busy than her dress but are nevertheless discordantly situated with respect to it–baby blue instead of navy blue, a dull grayish green instead of the saturated green to which it stands, in the overall composition, in odd contrast”:

Medium shot of Emmi in the dress and sitting in front of the painting and curtains referenced above

To Price “the contrast eludes metaphor” and because “this green is not like that green, then Emmi cannot be defined by the objects and spaces that constitute her on a contingent–and thus reversible–basis.”

My Loving Wife explained to me that this is also a wrap dress like the one designed by Diane von Furstenberg, which per this Time Magazine article she created “for the kind of woman she aspired to be: independent, ambitious, and above all, liberated.” Fascinatingly, it also states that “von Furstenberg was told from a young age that ‘fear is not an option.'” The similarity of that quote to the title of this month’s movie may be just a coincidence, but Emmi’s fashion sense surely isn’t, especially when you consider how many of these garments she has in her wardrobe:

Another wrap dress...
...and another...
...and another.

Fassbinder similarly uses the television and frames within frames that appear in Heaven, represented here by a single powerful camera movement:

Medium shot of Cary's son Ned (William Reynolds) and a salesman (Forrest Lewis) presenting her with a television
As the camera tracks in on her reflection...
It creates the appearance that she is inside it.

As a launchpad to do his own thing. He transforms the TV from a would-be prison cell into an symbol for the respectable German family that Emmi’s son Bruno (Peter Gauhe) believes she has disgraced with her choice of husband:

Meanwhile, almost every other aspect of the film’s mise-en-scène is a cage. This includes the wedding where Ali and Emmi celebrate their wedding:

Ali and Emmi at a restaurant, framed in a doorway

The apartment and bedroom where Ali seeks solace (and couscous!) after his relationship with Emmi calcifies into yet another instrument of exploitation:

Ali and his mistress Barbara are shown in long shot through a railing as she opens the door of her apartment to him
Barbara holds Ali in an interior long shot framed by a doorway

The stairwell where Emmi eats lunch alone after being shunned by her charwomen:

Long shot of Emmi with her lunch on a stairwell behind a railing

Then, once back in their good graces, joins them in giving the cold shoulder to their new co-worker Yolanda (Helga Ballhaus), a Herzegovinian immigrant:

Yolanda eats lunch alone in a composition which echoes the previous one

And a shot-reverse shot of a nosy neighbor (Elma Karlowa) watching Ali and Emmi mount the stairs of her building that, Manny Farber writes in an essay collected in the book Negative Space, “suggests all three, like all Fassbinder’s denizens, are caught in a shifting but nevertheless painful power game of top dogs and underdogs”:

Over-the-shoulder shot of Ali and Emmi going up the stairs behind a metal screen
Medium shot of Mrs. Kargus, who is also behind a screen

But my favorite aspect of Ali is reminiscent less of Sirk than something Richard Jameson once said about the movie Once Upon a Time in the West. He described it as “an opera in which arias are not sung but stared,” and that’s a perfect fit for this film as well! You can practically hear the thoughts of Asphalt Bar proprietress Barbara (Barbara Valentin) as she sizes up Emmi, who has appeared in her establishment for a second time hoping to find Ali:

And those of the waiter (Hannes Gromball) at the restaurant “where Hitler used to eat from 1929 to ’33” (!) as he contemplates his unusual customers:

Medium shot of a waiter

“Sometimes, long silences seem to be an expression of the social hostility encountered by Emmi and Ali, as in the climactic scene in an outdoor cafe immediately before their regenerative vacation,” notes James C. Franklin in a Literature/Film Quarterly article called “Method and Message: Forms of Communication in Fassbinder’s Angst Essen Seele Auf (the movie’s German title) where “the interaction of the visual image and the silence creates an atmosphere of utter coldness and hostility”:

Extreme long shot of Ali and Emmi in a sea of yellow tables
A crowd of waiters and customers stare at Ali and Emmi
Close-up of Ali caressing Emmi's hair as she weeps

However, my favorite examples of where (as Franklin eloquently puts it) “there is much to be heard in the silence of the soundtrack” are the looks Ali and Emmi give each other the morning after he first comes back from a night out blackout drunk:

Medium shot of Emmi staring at Ali
Reverse shot of Ali staring back

And then doesn’t arrive home at all:

Another medium shot of Emmi staring at Ali
And another reverse shot of Ali staring back

The latter occur in the film’s final ten minutes. In a response to a chapter in Robert Pippin’s book Douglas Sirk: Filmmaker and Philosopher for the national meeting of the American Society for Aesthetics that he posted on Letterboxd, Matt Strohl comments on a phenomenon that he calls the “double ending” of subversive melodramas whereby “an ostensible happy ending is subverted by some unsettling element, which might then prompt us to reflect on whether it was really such a happy ending after all and to reinterpret the film in this light.” Although All That Heaven Allows concludes with Cary resolving to “come home” to her lover Ron (Hudson), both scholars argue that we should feel uneasy about this, Pippin (as paraphrased by Strohl) because Cary “did not make the decision to enter into this relationship” but rather “fell into it because of Ron’s newfound need for a caretaker” and Strohl because “Cary has not gotten over her fears and become a full-fledged agent, but rather has slid into a different socially-defined gendered role that she has not actively chosen.”

Ali: Fear Eats the Soul is a different kind of beast. The scene after the second staredown depicted above opens with Ali “gambling away a week’s wages” (as Barbara points out to him) at the Asphalt Bar:

Long shot of Ali seated at a table in the Asphalt Bar playing cards

He busts out and sends a friend to his place for 100 more marks. While he waits for the money, Ali goes to the restroom and proceeds to slap himself in the face multiple times in a weird twist on Jackie Gleason’s Minnesota Fats freshening-up routine in The Hustler:

Medium shot of Ali slapping himself in the face as he looks in a mirror
Continuation of the previous shot
Continuation of the previous two shots

As he sits back down at the table and immediately proceeds to lose a hand, Emmi enters the bar in the background:

Emmi enters the Asphalt Bar in the background as Ali continues gambling in the foreground

Barbara brings her a Coke, the drink she ordered the night she met Ali, and Emmi asks her to play the tune they later danced to. Ali and his companions stare at Emmi as Barbara selects the song on the jukebox in the foreground of a three-layer composition:

Three-layer composition: Barbara programs the jukebox in the foreground, Ali and his companions stare at Emmi in the middle ground, and she sits at a table in the background

As soon as the music begins playing, Ali stands up and asks Emmi to dance. As the sway back and forth he confesses that he has slept with other women, but she assures him the it isn’t important and that he’s a free man who can do as he likes. “But when we’re together, we must be nice to each other,” she says. “Otherwise, life’s not worth living.”

Long shot of Ali and Emmi slow dancing

“I don’t want other women,” he responds. “I love only you.” Suddenly, he collapses to the ground, moaning in pain:

Long shot of Emmi gasping as Ali writhes in pain on the ground

The final scene takes place in a hospital. “He has a perforated stomach ulcer,” a doctor (Hark Bohm) tells Emmi. “It happens a lot with foreign workers. It’s the stress. And there’s not much we can do. We’re not allowed to send them to convalesce. We can only operate. And six months later they have another ulcer.”

Medium shot of a doctor giving his diagnosis of Ali's condition to Emmi

“No he won’t,” Emmi insists. “I’ll do everything in my power. . . . ” The clearly skeptical doctor interrupts her: “Well, the best of luck anyway.” Emmi walks over to Ali and the camera tracks in on their reflection in the mirror:

Long shot of Emmi holding Ali's hand reflected in a mirror

The doctor closes the door:

Medium shot of the doctor closing the door

And the film ends with a shot of Emmi crying as she holds an unconscious Ali’s hand:

Medium shot of Emmi holding Ali's hand

The utility of the “double ending” for Strohl is that it can explicate an otherwise inchoate sense that “there’s something off” about a Hollywood ending. There’s obviously no need for that here, but if broaden this concept and reinterpret it through the lens of the drink writing idea of a “finish,” it can also give voice to whatever lingers in your mind after the final credits have rolled. Ali‘s finish is the same as the Theobroma’s: they’re both bittersweet, which, if you don’t think that’s appropriate to the Valentine Season, you’ve never really been in love.

Cheers!

All original photographs in this post are by Marion Penning, aka My Loving Wife. Links to all of the entries in this series can be found here.

Ithaca Film Journal: 2/13/25

What I’m Seeing This Week: I didn’t make it to I’m Still Here last week, so I’m going to try to catch it at Cinemapolis after work today, plus I hope to see all three of the Oscar-nominated shorts programs screening there and at Cornell Cinema before next Thursday!

Also in Theaters: I’m saving it for next week for scheduling reasons, but No Other Land is actually the new release opening in Ithaca (at Cinemapolis) today that I’m most looking forward to. The best first-run movies now playing locally that I’ve already seen are The Brutalist and Nickel Boys, both of which are at Cinemapolis as well. I also enjoyed Dahomey, which screens at Cornell Cinema tonight; A Complete Unknown, which continues its run at Cinemapolis; Moana 2, which is still going strong at the Regal Ithaca Mall; and two films which close at Cinemapolis today, Memoir of a Snail and The Seed of the Sacred Fig. This week’s special events are highlighted by the return of the Banff Centre Mountain Film Festival to Cornell tomorrow and Saturday and a free screening of Benji at Cinemapolis on Sunday as part of their “Family Classics Picture Show” series. Your best bets for repertory fare are two 4k restorations at Cornell Cinema: The Annihilation of Fish screens there tonight, and Happy Together follows it tomorrow.

Home Video: If, like me, you were scared away from last Saturday’s Soundtrack to a Coup d’État screening at Cornell Cinema by the weather forecast, fear not! Current Cornell faculty, staff, and students can view this ambitious and stylish found footage documentary about the assassination of Congolese Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba on Kanopy thanks to a license paid for by the Library, and everyone else can rent it from a variety of streaming video platforms. It is edited to the sound and rhythm of the jazz musicians who were unwittingly being used as “cultural ambassadors” to the third world by the same American government that likely killed him until they got wise, and although at 150 minutes it runs a bit long, it’s frequently funny, sometimes shocking, and never dull.

Previous “Ithaca Film Journal” posts can be found here. A running list of all of my “Home Video” recommendations can be found here.

Ithaca Film Journal: 2/6/25

What I’m Seeing This Week: I’m going with Soundtrack to a Coup d’État, which plays Cornell Cinema on Saturday, and I’m Still Here, which opens at Cinemapolis tomorrow.

Also in Theaters: My favorite new release now playing Ithaca is once again All We Imagine as Light, which screens at Cornell Cinema tonight. The Brutalist, which is at Cinemapolis and the Regal Ithaca Mall, and Nickel Boys, which is at Cinemapolis, are contenders for my Movie Year 2024 top ten list too, and I also enjoyed A Complete Unknown (Cinemapolis + the Regal), Memoir of a Snail (Cinemapolis), Nosferatu (Cinemapolis + the Regal), and The Seed of the Sacred Fig (Cinemapolis). Noteworthy special events include free screenings of I Didn’t See You There (which is directed by Reid Davenport, whose new film Life After just debuted at Sundance to much acclaim) and Oppenheimer at Cornell Cinema on Tuesday and Wednesday respectively and a screening of Bisbee ’17 followed by a conversation with director Robert Greene there on Monday. Finally, your best bets for repertory fare are The Third Man, and The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp, which play Cornell Cinema Friday and Sunday respectively. You can also see Nosferatu the Vampyre there tonight.

Home Video: Speaking of my top ten list, I now know for sure that Evil Does Not Exist, which is currently streaming on the Criterion Channel, will be on it following a second viewing. Oft-described as an eco-fable or -parable, it is more broadly about the concept of balance: although the bare-bones plot revolves around a “glamping” concern descending on a rural farming community, the gutshot deer at the beginning of the film which was dead before they ever arrived demonstrates that the one at the end doesn’t have anything to do with it directly. Playmode (what a great awful name!) employee Takahashi (Ryûji Kosaka) is instead standing next to Hitoshi Omika’s Takumi when they encounter it because he has gotten absurdly carried away with an idea of who he *could* be, which only serves to reveal how little he knows about the man he actually is and the world he’s trying to shoehorn himself into. Evil Does (Not) Exist (which is how the font coloring of the title card suggests it maybe should be written) also features a satisfyingly crisp winter color palette and a frustrating community feedback meeting that I have been on both sides of the table of at least a hundred times in my life.

Previous “Ithaca Film Journal” posts can be found here. A running list of all of my “Home Video” recommendations can be found here.