Last March I celebrated being fully back to “using cinema as a window on the world and a lens through which I can interrogate my thoughts and feelings and refine them into a more consistent and generous philosophy” with my first proper top ten list in many years. In the same post I mentioned the “mixtapes” I’ve been compiling bi-annually for the past decade and started sharing on this blog in 2022, but I didn’t quite make the connection that these are essentially the same activity.
Although I’ve historically been adamant that, as I said in 2021, the songs I include on my mixes “are not necessarily the best songs of the previous six months in my opinion, but rather the ones that gave me the most pleasure and/or affected me the most,” it recently struck me that after more than a decade of listening to hundreds of new albums each year, I likely know more about music than I give myself credit for, at least on an intuitive level; conversely, although I watch hundreds of new movies each year and also spend quite a bit of time immersed in older ones, my knowledge of cinema relative to people who write about it professionally isn’t nearly what it used to be in my 20s when I was fresh out of a film studies program and could afford to live as though I did as well. Even back then I tried to embrace my amateur status: that’s when I came up with the idea of a “movie year” that starts and ends in March instead of January, for instance. Just paying attention isn’t a surefire way to avoid falling into imitative patterns, though, and I recently found myself pondering whether or not this annual list-making exercise serves any purpose for me at all. Delaying its creation makes it a truer representation of my favorites from 2024 by allowing two extra months for many of the most important titles that posterity will label with that year to reach Ithaca and the streaming video services I subscribe to, sure, but is it really worth the time and effort?
To my very great surprise, the answer to this question came from my younger self. Nearly twenty years ago I wrote the following:
I suppose that it’s possible to construct a Top Ten that would satisfy me structured around a list of films numbered from 1-10 that devotes one or two sentences to each movie, with a paragraph-long introduction and conclusion. Possible, but certainly not likely–at any rate, there are better ways. A good list might include scenes from films or lines of dialogue. It can include upcoming films, old films, ideas for films. Buildings. Political scandals. People. Why not? If you’ve explained your goals adequately it can include anything.
At the very least it can include nine films, or eleven. It can include re-releases, short films, and television episodes/seasons/series.
Or. Or the critic can accept all of the limitations of the Top Ten list and simply scribble down ten films and be done with it. Let the readers do the leg work, right? My editor wants a list? Here you go: a list. Because any list of films is interesting, just not necessarily fraught with any particular meaning.
In the 2004 Village Voice year-end poll Lars von Trier’s Dogville (2003) placed third. This did not mean that Dogville was the year’s third best film. It did not mean that it was the year’s third most important, talked about, or divisive film. All that it meant was that Dogville finished third in the Village Voice‘s year-end poll. But by finishing third in this poll Dogville set off a round of discussion about itself, Lars von Trier, the Voice poll, year-end polls in general, and the movies that was important, talked about, and divisive.
What am I saying? I’m suggesting that we don’t need to do away with year-end polls entirely, but that we need to either think more about them or give them less space. That we need to strive to make them relevant and to articulate why we think we’ve succeeded, or that we need to treat them like coffee table books: as conversation starters, and nothing more.
It pains me to see so. many. italics, but I have to admit that the kid has a point. More than one, even! Top ten lists are inherently the kind of endeavor that most people are going to spend either too much time on or too little. Like movie reviews they have value in the aggregate, too, but each individual one of them says more about the person who compiled it than the films they selected, and the list maker can’t just assume that readers already have the necessary context to make sense of their choices–they have to provide it. Professional film critics probably don’t have much say in the matter: they have to deliver whatever the publication they write for wants on deadline with a word count. There’s nothing stopping me, though, from using as much space I need in order to not just explain my picks, but also canvass the entire pool of works I was choosing from and explore how it came to be. What made it to Ithaca . . . and what didn’t? What did I decide not to watch and why? Are there movies that I think the world needs which aren’t even being made?
The problem is that I don’t actually *want* to write this post. I do this for fun, after all, and I’m impatient to move on to Movie Year 2025. And that brings me back to the idea of a playlist. I only recently started providing any commentary at all about the songs on my mixes: initially I just shared the track listing and a Spotify link and called it a day because the idea was for people to actually listen to everything. And that’s true of my favorite films of the year as well! The 13 mentioned below are my answer to the hypothetical question “what should I watch?” They’re the ones I’m most eager to talk about and I can’t resist the urge to add a bit more commentary here, but I’ve already written about everything on Letterboxd and/or this blog at least once, and frankly I’m more interested in having an actual conversation than pontificating further, so please do check them out for yourself and tell me what you think!
Speaking of Letterboxd, one of the main reasons I can barely imagine life without it anymore despite becoming the last cinephile on earth to join little more than 18 months ago is because it makes it super easy to ascertain that I tagged 124 films “Movie Year 2024.” By way of illustrating what does and doesn’t qualify, when I watch Queer after it debuts on Max next month, I won’t tag it “Movie Year 2025” because it played Ithaca in December; however, Universal Language *will* qualify even though it was screened at the 2024 editions of Cannes and TIFF and a bunch of other film festivals because when it opens at Cinemapolis next week, that will be my first opportunity to see it. Anyway, I also saw everything in the Indiewire Critics Poll and CriticsTop10 top 50 lists except Queer and Youth (Hard Times), all of which means that, 1) my local movie theaters are awesome, and 2) this is basically the “top 10% in the class.” Here are the new releases I liked best:
10. Green Border. One of three movies I spent a lot of time thinking about this year as representative of philosophically different takes on the efficacy of depicting horrific acts of injustice. Green Border occupies the optimistic/determined quadrant: director Agnieszka Holland clearly believes that shining a light on the evil deeds desensitized people do in the dark when told enough times that it’s their job and/or their duty will eventually put a stop to them. No Other Land is similarly optimistic, but resigned to the possibility that we the viewers just don’t have the attention span anymore, while Incident is pessimistic but nonetheless keen to continue the fight.
8. Here. Perhaps the most formally audacious and emotionally satisfying film on this list and connected thematically to a number of the rest. Including:
8. La Chimera. Above-ground/beneath-the-surface cantastoria about what it means to live a good life: if your heart’s desire is buried in the dirt under your feet, do you build a shrine on it or dig?
8. About Dry Grasses. When you spend 197 minutes with an unsympathetic character and don’t tire of them, the movie they’re in did something right! Reminded me of college.
6. All We Imagine as Light. Either this film’s adaptation of the Phosphorescent song “Christmas Down Under” or the camera movement at the end of Here was my favorite closing shot of the year.
5. Close Your Eyes. Do you have to know you’re doing it for your life to be your art? Makes an interesting pairing with my first and maybe always favorite cinematic depiction of Ithaca My First Film in the way it depicts a filmmaker engaging with a work made in their youth.
4. Red Rooms. Perhaps the year’s most well-constructed movie. I am planning to write about its poker scenes after my “Drink & a Movie” series wraps in December.
3. Do Not Expect Too Much from the End of the World. History is supposedly written by the victors, but the idea of “winning” is as slippery as quote attribution and the fossil record and racial memory are harder to control than state media and schools, so if you’re thinking in a long enough timeframe, it’s more accurate to say that points will be tallied based on surviving documentation.
2. Evil Does Not Exist. Another film that explores the societal implications of the ideas about personal happiness that appealed to me so much in some of the titles on this list.
1. I Saw the TV Glow. Presumptive shoo-in for any Best of the 2020s list I might someday make along with Crimes of the Future and Petite Maman.
* * *
I also saw a number of terrific older films for the first time last year. Here are the ones that made the biggest impressions:
5. Whiplash. There are still a number of prominent movies released during my period of self-imposed semi-exile from “the lost continent of cinephilia” that I haven’t caught up with yet, but I’ll be surprised if I enjoy any of them half as much as I did Whiplash!
4. Man’s Castle. Instantly my second-favorite movie directed by Frank Borzage after my September “Drink & a Movie” selection History Is Made at Night.
3. House of Usher. I wrote about this film in the next entry in that series.
2. The Act of Killing. This is what the pessimistic/resigned quadrant in the framework I started to sketch out when talking about Green Border looks like.
1. The Long Day Closes. A legit contender for my 2032 Sight & Sound “Greatest Films of All Times” ballot!
* * *
Porcelain War played Cinemapolis for one week in January so I definitely did have an opportunity to see *all* of the films up for Oscars tonight! I guess I’ll have to settle for 48 out of 49. As always, these are the films I’m rooting for, not the ones I expect to win.
Actress in a Supporting Role: Ariana Grande – Wicked
Animated Short: Wander to Wonder
Animated Feature Film: Flow
Original Screenplay: A Real Pain
Adapted Screenplay: A Complete Unknown. I won’t be at all disappointed if Nickel Boys wins, but I loved Pete Seeger’s strategically ill-advised speech about the “teaspoon brigade” and the placement of Joan Baez’s comment “you’re kind of an asshole, Bob.”
Makeup & Hairstyling: The Substance. Demi Moore’s Elisabeth Sparkle’s first prematurely decrepit finger was one of Movie Year 2024’s standout moments for me.
Production Design: The Brutalist
Costume Design: Wicked
International Feature Film: I’m Still Here
Actor in a Supporting Role: Kieran Culkin – A Real Pain
Visual Effects: Dune: Part Two
Film Editing: The Brutalist
Documentary Short: Incident. The only way I won’t throw something at the television if it doesn’t win is if Instruments of a Beating Heart does instead.
Documentary Feature: No Other Land
Cinematography: The Brutalist. I’m incredulous that Nickel Boys wasn’t nominated in this category.
Live-Action Short: A Lien
Sound: Dune: Part Two
Original Score: The Brutalist
Original Song: “Mi Camino” – Emilia Pérez. But how did “Claw Machine” from I Saw the TV Glow not even make the shortlist?
Actor in a Leading Role: Ralph Fiennes – Conclave. Give the man an Oscar already!
Directing: Brady Corbet – The Brutalist.
Actress in a Leading Role: Demi Moore – The Substance
Best Picture: The Brutalist.